|
|
Anti-Virus Software, and why its now virtually
useless
(and even a hindrance)
by Bob Latshaw
It's 2010, folks, you don't "need" anti-virus software if you own a PC running
Windows XP or later (emphasis on the word "need"). It's the equivalent of
walking around all day with a helmet on in case you hit your head. It will
slow you down, and the odds are that your skull can withstand whatever impact
your clumsy feet get it into. Yes, that's a pretty bold statement, but I
felt the need to write this article because of the disproportionate amount of
people who still believe that a computer without anti-virus is like a body
without clothing. I've been fixing and programming computers
since 1977 and I've watched the PC since its birth (when only a handful of nerds
like me used them), to today where virtually no home is without one. There
have been four laptops in our house for almost the last decade, and all running
without anti-virus, and none of them has ever gotten a virus. Keep in mind
the other 3 laptops are used by my wife and 2 daughters (ages 15 and 10).
Yes, they all surf the web on a regular basis and they all have email accounts
with email coming in everyday. How is this possible? It's easier
than you think, and we are protected more than you know. I'm sure all of
you have known at least someone who's gotten a virus recently or had it happen
to yourself and had to go through the nightmare of rebuilding your hard drive
from scratch and maybe even losing years worth of data. This leads me to
my next question, "did you have anti-virus software on the computer at the
time?". The odds are you did. Why? Well most PCs come with
anti-virus loaded from the factory and most people do keep it up to date out of
shear fear. This takes us to the next question, "did it help?". No
it didn't, and that's the part of the equation people amazingly seem to forget.
In the 1980s and 1990s, the PC was still in its infancy, and every corrupt
computer nerd was trying to write viruses to exploit the incredible amount of
security holes in it. Microsoft made a strategic decision back then to NOT
get into the anti-virus business. Why? It was simply a public
perception issue. Being the monopoly that they were, people would be quite
suspicious of the company selling anti-virus software because the attitude at
the time (and I remember reading an article about this) was pretty much
"Microsoft could simply write viruses to keep you buying the anti-virus
software". Sounds pretty far fetched, huh? Not really for us geeks
who remember the tactics of Microsoft back then. When DOS 2.0 was
released, there was a rumored memo that was circulated to the Microsoft software
engineers with the motto "DOS 2 isn't done until Lotus won't run".
Basically, Microsoft designed DOS 2.0 so that one of their competitor's products
(Lotus 1-2-3) wouldn't run on it (and it didn't), hence giving their own Excel spreadsheet
software a HUGE advantage. With that kind of perception, its easy to see
how the public wouldn't trust them in the anti-virus market.
The first two decades of the PC (and Windows) existence was filled with all
kinds of viruses, and in the early days, most viruses were spread by floppy
discs. In fact, most viruses were designed to be spread that way.
Then came the internet revolution in the mid 90s, and it opened a whole other
can of worms (literally). Even though the internet has been around since
the 1960s, it was only used by the military and universities through the 60s,
70s, and 80s, but when home computers began accessing it, virus creators had a
field day so to speak. Internet "Software Libraries" began being created
where people could access thousands of programs from one location and it created
a great place to "hide" viruses. The greatest exploit was though email.
Viruses were created that looked like something funny or something important and
people only had to open the attachment to get the virus. Companies like
Norton and McAfee were cleaning up on the fear of viruses, and God bless them.
They did a remarkable job (and still do) tracking every known virus out there.
Fast forward to today's world. After the release of Windows XP in 2001,
Microsoft finally began to buckle down and take the virus and spyware threat
seriously. They found it rather embarrassing I'm sure that virtually every
PC sold came with anti-virus software preinstalled. What's that say about
your product when it has to come with someone else's product just to protect it?
Around 2005, Microsoft "acquired" (love that word) a small anti-spyware company,
and in classic Microsoft style, simply slapped their name on it and called it
"Windows Defender". Since the release of Windows Vista in 2007, all
version of Windows come with Windows Defender built-in. Users of Windows
XP and earlier versions of Windows can
download Windows Defender for free, and unlike other anti-spyware programs,
the updates are all free. Now, Microsoft had to walk a fine line because
if they made the product cover all known viruses, companies like McAfee and
Norton would cry foul and have the anti-trust people all over them. What
they did, in a planned staged process was to make Windows Defender cover spyware
and all the other annoying software. That way, it would not appear like
they were simply going to put all the anti-virus companies out of business.
Where the true genius came into play was how they very discreetly added
something else to the automated "Windows Update" called the "Windows Malicious
Software Removal Tool", which DID cover viruses. So, in a nutshell, with
Windows Defender and the Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool, you're covered
against viruses, spyware, and all kinds of annoying stuff for free!
Unfortunately, Microsoft can't publicly say this because again it would be an
illegal use of their monopoly power, and a lot of anti-virus makers would go out
of business if the entire public suddenly realized this. Anti-virus
companies are quite aware of this and mark my word, their days are numbered in
selling to home users, and they know it. The future of anti-virus
companies is selling to corporations who run email servers, and web portals like
facebook, but the concept of end-user anti-virus protection is slowly fading.
Ok, enough of the history lesson. "But PCs still get viruses" you say. Yes
they do and regardless of what protection is on your PC, most viruses do most of
their damage in their first week of life. You know what that means? That means
that the odds are that if you get a virus, you will get the virus before
Microsoft or McAfee or Norton are even aware of it, which means your anti-virus
software is virtually useless! Yes, Microsoft is protecting your PC from within
now, but regardless of what company is doing it, the fact remains that none of
them can ever stay ahead of the viruses. You're only protected against "known"
viruses that have already done most of their damage. With that being said, and
to address the people who would trust McAfee or Norton regardless, unlike
Windows Defender and the Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool, third party
anti-virus programs like Norton or McAfee scan every single file you
access and check it for viruses before it can load. This slows your PC down to
1/3 speed in many cases. When you start a program these days, its not just one
program file that needs to be scanned, in many cases its hundreds, and 99.999% of the time its all in
vain! What an absolute waste of your processor's power and time.
Another development that really does protect you and most people aren't aware of
this is the fact that as of today, virtually every email server on the planet
scans all passing email for viruses. Have you noticed we no longer get
stories on the news like "be warned of an email attachment called XXX"?
The email companies fixed that problem years ago, and quietly. As with any
anti-virus, and like I said before, there's still always a risk of something new
getting undetected and its also why email companies aren't publicly claiming to
protect you from viruses. If one gets through, you could sue them, but the
fact remains, they are most likely on top of the situation as well as they can
be. Just follow the golden rules of not opening any attachment if you
don't know who its from (duh) and don't open any attachment who's file name has
an extension of (.exe, .com, .vbs, bat or anything that can "run").
Basically, stick to documents (.txt or .doc) and media files (video, audio,
etc..). If you don't recognize the type of file, don't open it.
Ok, so we know now that viruses no longer spread by discs, and email servers are
checking our email for us, and Windows now has built-in virus protection that
doesn't slow down your PC, but yet people still get viruses......how? The
one last great frontier for virus makers is web sites. I've cleaned
viruses from many business networks, and the culprit is almost always someone
who was visiting web sites they shouldn't have. This one is really a no
brainer and if I was able to teach my daughters this when they were each like 5,
I think most people should be able to grasp the concept. Simply pretend
that everyone can see the sites you're visiting like they were real buildings.
You wouldn't be embarrassed if everyone saw you walk into Sears or Walmart, but
you wouldn't want your mom seeing you walk into a porn shop, would you?
Your safety from viruses goes right along with this. You know who you can
trust and who you can't, and if you're not sure who you can trust, just
don't ever answer "yes" to any question or any popup or any download. It's
that simple.
People, go uninstall all of your anti-virus and internet security programs (oh
yeah, they've pretty much become a joke as well since Windows has had a built-in
firewall since Windows XP). Get rid of them! They're slowing your
computer down! ...and they're slowing YOU down as well since you're always
having to answer to them! Learn a few good habits and you will be better
protected than ANY piece of software could ever provide.
One more note. Windows Vista and Windows 7 introduced a new "feature"
called UAC (User Account Control), and the premise behind this is to prompt you
for your permission for just about everything. The idea is that if a virus
is the one trying to perform the task, you can answer "no" and be protected.
Guess what, 99.99% of people wouldn't have a clue when to answer "no", and I'm
one of them, and I know what I'm doing! This "feature" can also cause good
programs to not work properly either. UAC should be pictured right next to
the word "overkill" in the dictionary. Unless you like being annoyed for
no reason, turn off UAC for a much smoother experience with your PC.
Now for the big question you're all thinking. "What if I uninstall my
anti-virus and find out later that it was the only thing that would have caught
the virus?" One of the BEST features of Windows that has been out since
XP, is something called "System Restore" (now called "System Protection" in
Vista and 7), and this enables you to put your PC back where it was right before
the virus hit it, and unlike anti-virus software, it can bring back any files
the virus damaged.
In summary, only you can prevent a virus from hitting your computer, and
anti-virus software just slows your machine down and gives you a false sense of
security. Follow the few simple rules that I've taught my own family, and
you too can have a faster running computer that's virus free for years to come.
©Copyright Latshaw Systems
|
|